Thursday, September 29, 2011

21st Century: Are we moving too fast?

When I was doing my undergrad work at Seton Hall years ago, the idea of 21st Century learning, skills, and teaching were not even discussed. I'm pretty sure we were still learning about bloom's taxonomy, John Dewey, and how to teach our children the basics of literacy, social studies, and how not to plagiarize.

Since I have been teaching, it seems that nothing I did during my undergrad has truly been worth it. I mean, I literally spent one semester creating a "Web Quest" for a basic computers class. While the web quest idea was interesting and engaging, I didn't see the point for it. Maybe that was their way to moving us towards 21st century skills and teaching. 

Thing is, I have never used, nor probably will ever use, a web quest during my teachings. The Internet, social media, and creativity have surpassed these once educational tools that are on our computers. Web quests are boring, as are watching videos, creating PowerPoint's, and the like. These things that I learned about in school WERE the 21st century skills that we needed. Now, they have been replaced, and rather quickly I might add, with creative blogging, interactive video chat, and more. Things have changed quickly because we are changing quickly. We want, and when I say we I mean our future generations, instantaneous interaction. We want feedback. We want things that will grab our attention and hold it for more than three and a half seconds. 

I am not griping. I was happy, and still happy, about my undergrad education in 21st century skills. These were the skills of the time. I just wish they have the foresight to see that those were educational tools of the 20th century. Now finishing up my graduate work, I realize that items are the wave of the future BUT this wave is already starting to crest. 

Google just turned 13. Facebook is 6 years old. YouTube has already been Time magazines person of the year (or was it people of the year?). Point is... are these items that are hot right now truly 21st century learning? Or are they the start of something larger and more interactive. If you have noticed, all of those websites look nothing like they did when they first started. Facebook is now undergoing its umpteenth change in the last year - this time to make it more user friendly and interactive. Google is always unveiling a new tool to its repertoire, such as Google +, google docs, or google apps. 

My hope is that we as educators can stay ahead of the curve instead of two steps behind it. While the world grabs a hold of blogging and wiki-ing (is that a word??), our younger generations have been there and already done that - they are off to bigger, better, and more secretive things that we will soon learn about. 

How do we stay ahead of the curve? Are we being disingenuous to the things that came before it? Are we smiting the old ways of doing things? 

I don't have answers to those but what I do know is this: 21st century skills and learning does not just happen with the internet, social media, or technology - it is a frame of mind. It is all about collaborating, creativity, and being a part of something bigger than yourself. If we can keep those items in mind, I hope we can be prepared for the 22nd century skills in time. 

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Great post. It was very insightful and even made me think a little bit. I like you used the word "crest" to describe where you believe we might be in 21st century technology. It does seem like things are "getting old" or are "redundant." Look how many apps there are and versions of social network sites. I too wonder what 22nd Century technology will look like.

Is this our new "way of life" or are we coming up with new ideas that will out-date these.

I look forward to reading.

kdwyer said...

I love the unique perspective you convey in this post! Unfortunately, I don't know that it is that we are moving too fast. Rather, I think in our hectic lives (especially that of teachers), we need to find more time to keep up-to-date. I can totally empathize what you are saying. I transferred to Rutgers from another grad school, so it was just a year and a half ago that I was required to create a WebQuest, which I also did not use! While it was a little unnerving that a lot of work went into something I wasn't really able to utilize, I feel that the wikis and blogs we are creating now we be around for a while and I will definitely be able to implement with success in my classroom. However, I'm sure something new and applicable will be on our computer screens before we know it.

Great post!

Johanna Cella said...

I thought your post was really interesting ... I find that my undergrad (and this was four years ago) is not very reflective of what is called for in the Schrum & Levin, and Richardson texts. This past weekend I was telling my mom about this course, and while she's definitely more advanced than most people her age -- due her graphic design field going entirely digital -- she feels like she's being left behind in the world of technology ... Interestingly enough, so do I.

I've never blogged or created a wiki. Sure I goofed around with html to make sites, but it was copy and paste, it didn't have the elements that Richardson described in his blogging chapters. Unfortunately my undergrad failed me in a way as well ... but I think they relied on the schools that we visited every semester to help make up the difference.

Shifting gears, I think PPTs, WebQuests and videos are fun. (smile) You need to find the right media, but there are some good ones out there, for example: http://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/energy-skate-park. I used this with my 8th graders when doing energy ... they loooove it! And here is a cute, short video that I sent to my colleague to use with her students when she gets to the cell unit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZK6YP1Smbxk -- it's quick, catchy, and they can play it whenever they want!

Alas, I do understand the growing pressure to be 'technologically advanced' ... and I must say, I'm starting to buckle. Even while doing this class!

Jon Buchalski said...

Very thought provoking post! There are a lot of things to think about moving forward, and you are right we will not have the answers because digital tools are being phased in and out daily. In term of technology the growth is exponential and new tools are expected to pushed out every 18 months, that means every two year we should be reevaluating how we are using technology with our students because they may have already moved on. I remember a few years ago having the ability to podcast lectures and presentations was incredible and I remember more recently listening to my supervisor explain to someone that they should not use podcasts because they are not relevant anymore. Historically speaking what were people more interested this week, the Amanda Knox trial or the release of the iPhone 4S?